<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.srevilak.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=CPTC%3A_Zoning_With_Overlay_Districts</id>
	<title>CPTC: Zoning With Overlay Districts - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.srevilak.net/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=CPTC%3A_Zoning_With_Overlay_Districts"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.srevilak.net/wiki/index.php?title=CPTC:_Zoning_With_Overlay_Districts&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-21T08:18:03Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.srevilak.net/wiki/index.php?title=CPTC:_Zoning_With_Overlay_Districts&amp;diff=1501&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>SteveR: initial revision</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.srevilak.net/wiki/index.php?title=CPTC:_Zoning_With_Overlay_Districts&amp;diff=1501&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2022-04-24T02:14:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;initial revision&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Course held via remote participation on April 21, 2022.  The&lt;br /&gt;
instructor was Jim Robbins, who&amp;#039;s Westboro&amp;#039;s town planner.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Spot Zoning is the practice of improving the value of a property in a&lt;br /&gt;
way that&amp;#039;s not shared by other properties in the district.  Zoning&lt;br /&gt;
changes that further a master plan are generally not considered spot&lt;br /&gt;
zoning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overlay districts are superimposed over existing ones.  They don&amp;#039;t&lt;br /&gt;
replace the underlying district; instead, they add a new layer of&lt;br /&gt;
controls.  Overlay districts can impose new restrictions, or loosen&lt;br /&gt;
existing ones.  Using an overlay avoids the need to rewrite the base&lt;br /&gt;
district zoning.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The validity of overlay districts has not been expressly addressed by&lt;br /&gt;
the (Massachusetts?) courts.  They should be sustainable if they are&lt;br /&gt;
not arbitrary and capricious and serve a legitimate planning purpose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Euclid v Amber (1926) upheld the concept of overlay districts.  In&lt;br /&gt;
that case, the overlay districts specified different building heights&lt;br /&gt;
in different areas&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Zoning is entitled to a strong presumption of validity.  It&amp;#039;s invalid&lt;br /&gt;
only if there is no rational relation to a public objective.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapter 40A Section 4 contains the uniformity clause of the&lt;br /&gt;
Massachusetts Zoning Act.  All uses within a district must be treated&lt;br /&gt;
the same.  This is sometimes referred to as the SCIT Doctrine: all&lt;br /&gt;
land in similar circumstances shall be treated alike.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Form and Controls of an Overlay district.  These define the purpose,&lt;br /&gt;
area, and regulations of the overlay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Massachusetts Smart Growth Toolkit advises planners to keep things&lt;br /&gt;
simple when the goal is to incentivize a use.  Having a&lt;br /&gt;
straightforward sets of rules creates less risk, and makes it more&lt;br /&gt;
likely that projects will proceed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Typical sections in an overlay district include&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* A statement of purpose&lt;br /&gt;
* Definitions (if not covered elsewhere in the bylaw)&lt;br /&gt;
* Applicability&lt;br /&gt;
* Process requirements (e.g., site plan review)&lt;br /&gt;
* Use regulations&lt;br /&gt;
* Development standards (which includes dimensional regulations)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overlay districts are useful for adding protections to hazard areas or&lt;br /&gt;
to natural resource areas.  They can be used to promote development&lt;br /&gt;
along transit corridors.  Examples include: adaptive re-use overlay&lt;br /&gt;
districts, mixed-use overlay districts, affordable housing overlay&lt;br /&gt;
districts, and overlay districts to encourage development in a&lt;br /&gt;
downtown area.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Westboro has an industrial overlay district where proponents can&lt;br /&gt;
receive height and density bonuses in exchange for low-impact and&lt;br /&gt;
sustainable development.   Westboro has another overlay whose purpose&lt;br /&gt;
is to revitalize and re-use existing properties.  This was used to&lt;br /&gt;
convert an old industrial site (an abrasives factory) into an&lt;br /&gt;
extension of the downtown.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chapter 40R allows cities and towns to establish smart growth overlay&lt;br /&gt;
districts.  These allow by right development that creates compact&lt;br /&gt;
residential uses in suitable locations.  40R overlays have to be&lt;br /&gt;
approved by Mass DHCD.  So far, 44 of these districts have been&lt;br /&gt;
approved statewide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An &amp;quot;IPOD&amp;quot; is an interim planning overlay district.  This can be used&lt;br /&gt;
as an alternative to a moratorium while changes to a bylaw are being&lt;br /&gt;
worked out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Advantages of overlay districts: they can be simpler than amending the&lt;br /&gt;
underlying zoning, they tend to be easier to adapt to geographically&lt;br /&gt;
challenging areas, the cost of drafting overlay district regulations&lt;br /&gt;
is typically no greater than the cost to rewrite a base district, they&lt;br /&gt;
can provide protection for hazard areas, and they&amp;#039;re often seen as&lt;br /&gt;
less risky by property owners.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Disadvantages of overlay districts: they create an extra layer of&lt;br /&gt;
regulations, they may inadvertently cause conflicts with regulations&lt;br /&gt;
for the base district, and they may be confusing to the public,&lt;br /&gt;
applicants, and enforcement officers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We now move on to questions and answers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: Are there examples of overlay districts that can promote&lt;br /&gt;
life sciences?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: Yes.  For example, you might offer a density or height bonus,&lt;br /&gt;
in exchange for using low impact development techniques.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: How new must a master plan be, in order to be considered&lt;br /&gt;
valid?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: Master plans should be updated every 10--12 years.  Overlays&lt;br /&gt;
should be consistent with updates to the master plan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: Why not just redo the base district?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: One reason is to avoid concerning property owners about&lt;br /&gt;
potential loss of value to their property, or concerns about making&lt;br /&gt;
their property non-conforming.  Owners tend to be more receptive when&lt;br /&gt;
they see you augmenting the set of uses allowed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: Do master plans have to be approved by town meeting?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: Massachusetts General Laws don&amp;#039;t require the master plan to be&lt;br /&gt;
approved by town meeting; it only has to be adopted by the local&lt;br /&gt;
planning board.  But there&amp;#039;s no harm in having it approved by town&lt;br /&gt;
meeting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: What about uses in the underlying district?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: The underlying uses are still allowed; the overlay just&lt;br /&gt;
incentivizes something else.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: Can you give an example of an overlay district that&lt;br /&gt;
conflicts with the underlying zoning?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: One example is a use that&amp;#039;s allowed in the base district, but&lt;br /&gt;
would be prohibited in the overlay.  For example, you might have an&lt;br /&gt;
industrial district that allows manufacturing of chemicals.  That use&lt;br /&gt;
could conflict with a groundwater protection overlay district that&lt;br /&gt;
prohibits such manufacturing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: Could an overlay district be used to require upper-story&lt;br /&gt;
step backs where a business districts abuts a residential district?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: That&amp;#039;s generally not a problem, as long as there&amp;#039;s a purpose&lt;br /&gt;
statement to make that objective clear.  The purpose statement should&lt;br /&gt;
contain a clear statement of intent.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: Can an overlay district be used to guide design preferences?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: Yes, but you have to be very specific about what you&amp;#039;re asking&lt;br /&gt;
for.  For example, by providing a set of design guidelines.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: Can an overlay district be used to prevent Marijuana uses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: In general, it would be better to use the overlay to indicate&lt;br /&gt;
where marijuana uses are allowed.  That tends to produce more&lt;br /&gt;
predictable results than defining areas where the use is prohibited.&lt;br /&gt;
An applicant might surprise you by proposing a marijuana use in an&lt;br /&gt;
area you hadn&amp;#039;t considered.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: Would a two-third&amp;#039;s vote of town meeting be required for an&lt;br /&gt;
overlay district to create affordable housing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: If the overlay meets the requirements of 40A&amp;#039;s housing choice&lt;br /&gt;
provisions, then you need a simple majority.  Otherwise, you&amp;#039;ll need a&lt;br /&gt;
two-third&amp;#039;s vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: What about an overlay for an MBTA district.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: The guidelines for MBTA districts are still being finalized,&lt;br /&gt;
but it&amp;#039;s probably safe to assume that will require a majority vote.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: Could you give a few examples of bonuses that could be used&lt;br /&gt;
in an overlay district?  Maybe tax incentive financing (TIF)?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: Overlay districts districts don&amp;#039;t contemplate TIF.  A TIF&lt;br /&gt;
requires adoption by both the executive and legislative branches of a&lt;br /&gt;
community.  You could allow things like additional height and massing,&lt;br /&gt;
reduced lot area per dwelling unit, or less open space.   You can also&lt;br /&gt;
make the bonus conditional on fulfilling a set of requirements, such&lt;br /&gt;
as using low-impact development, LEED compliance, providing EV&lt;br /&gt;
charging stations, or using renewable energy sources.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: What about enforcement?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: Applicants can always seek a variance from the zoning board of&lt;br /&gt;
appeals.  They can also challenge your bylaw in court.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Question: Is it possible to do a small overlay district -- a single&lt;br /&gt;
street corner for example?  Or, would that be considered spot zoning?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Answer: Overlays should further the purpose of a master plan.  You&lt;br /&gt;
can&amp;#039;t necessarily tie them to a specific parcel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In closing, Mr. Robbins notes that in today&amp;#039;s market, residential is&lt;br /&gt;
the number one thing that developers want to build.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Notes]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>SteveR</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>